Go Back   CORTEX Forums > Local Happenings > CORTEX Blogs > Blue Sky Thinking
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Total Cost of Ownership for Enterprise 2.0

This is a discussion on Total Cost of Ownership for Enterprise 2.0 within the Blue Sky Thinking forums, part of the CORTEX Blogs category; I have been on this topic for ages and I truly believe that this is an answer that could only be answered once I have experienced it. Here we go. ...


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 20th July 2009, 04:09 PM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 46
Sean Lew is on a distinguished road
Default Total Cost of Ownership for Enterprise 2.0

I have been on this topic for ages and I truly believe that this is an answer that could only be answered once I have experienced it. Here we go. I think the total cost of ownership is something that is very difficult to calculate. First of all, alot of the “gardeners” or “champions” I have seen and worked with work extra long hours to ensure that the platform is “nice” and “clean” and still perform their day jobs extremely well. So if effort is invested after hours could we consider this as part of the TCO equation? Some might argue there is a opportunity cost involved and they could be working on real work after hours. But if they are not motivated by their day job scope and prefers tending the “garden” then would they work after hours? I do not think there is an answer to this.

What I have seen is that champions move in and take control of the maintenance of the platform and look after it. All of them have day jobs and generally their day jobs is not affected by their extra work load. IT seldom gets invloved in maintenance other than the standard harddrive replacement, server upgrades and stuff like that which applies to all software that is running in house. These costs can be calculated easily. It seems to me that the human maintenance costs is relatively low as well - as long as you have the right people maintaining it. Do you need a dedicated team to maintain a large Enterprise deployment? Maybe.

I think the TCO arguement for Enterprise 2.0 is still very new and unclear. I do not know all the answers but the above is something I have observed.



More...
Sean Lew is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Simplifying Enterprise 2.0 Sean Lew Blue Sky Thinking 0 20th July 2009 04:09 PM
NBN won't cost more than $43bn: Conroy Latest News Headlines 2009 Q3 News Headlines 0 15th July 2009 11:50 AM
The cost of hiring poor programmers Leigh Kennedy I SQL 0 8th July 2009 02:36 PM
IBM and Researchers From Harvard Launch Project to Discover Lower Cost, More Efficien Latest News Headlines IBM and Cognos Forum 0 9th December 2008 12:28 PM


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 09:58 AM.

© The Business Intelligence Group

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO