| |
| ||||||
Accurate, Fast or Consistent- When Dealing with HR Data, You Can Only Have TwoThis is a discussion on Accurate, Fast or Consistent- When Dealing with HR Data, You Can Only Have Two within the Infohrm forums, part of the CORTEX Blogs category; I wanted to follow up on the blog post from Paige Menge on July 16: Effective Date vs. Action*Date, where she discusses the use of an “Action Date” (when something ... |
 |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
22nd July 2009, 12:30 PM
| #1 |
| Guru Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 102
 |  Accurate, Fast or Consistent- When Dealing with HR Data, You Can Only Have Two I wanted to follow up on the blog post from Paige Menge on July 16: Effective Date vs. Action*Date, where she discusses the use of an “Action Date” (when something happened, such as an employee termination), vs. an “Effective Date” (when it is actually entered into a system or database).* Paige states, quite correctly, that [...]  Get More from the original blog... |
|      |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| RMBS pricing consistent with bank paper | Latest News Headlines | 2009 Q3 News Headlines | 0 | 13th July 2009 04:59 PM |
| Microsoft's Madison Fast Track | Doug Heywood | Microsoft Forum | 0 | 24th February 2009 09:04 PM |
| Data Mart V Data Warehousing - The geat Debate | binboy | Data Warehousing Tips and Techniques | 1 | 16th July 2008 10:15 AM |
| | |
| | |
Linear Mode
