Go Back   CORTEX Forums > Local Happenings > CORTEX Blogs > Innovations in Data Management
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Positioning your Database Start Up for Data Warehousing

This is a discussion on Positioning your Database Start Up for Data Warehousing within the Innovations in Data Management forums, part of the CORTEX Blogs category; Image via Wikipedia BI /Data Warehousing is an easier market to enter for new database platform vendors.* This is for a few reasons.* Firstly, most BI deployments are custom built ...


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 6th July 2009, 08:52 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 71
Tony Bain is on a distinguished road
Default Positioning your Database Start Up for Data Warehousing

Image via Wikipedia

BI/Data Warehousing is an easier market to enter for new database platform vendors.* This is for a few reasons.* Firstly, most BI deployments are custom built projects for each organization.* This means the ability to pick and choose various layers of the stack is much greater.*

Secondly, BI/DW projects success/failure metrics are often tied to database platform driven properties – performance, scalability, load times etc.* The ability to stray outside any existing database platform “standards” to choose a platform that better meets key metrics is more tolerable.

Thirdly, because the ratio of BI to OLTP is low, the associated impact of violating a corporate standard is much lower.* With OLTP applications typically deployed in the hundreds or the thousands within the enterprise, lack of firm standards could end up with dozens of different database platforms requiring operational support, spread across hundreds of systems.* On the other hand, violating the standard for a handful of DW systems is unlikely to turn into the management nightmare that would occur with the former situation.

The data warehouse database platform has been an area of heavy innovation and many newcomers have appeared over the last 5 years.** If you are going to enter this space you better make sure you have your point of difference pitch really honed.*

In addition you should:
  • Ensure you are supporting standard interfaces (OLE-DB or ODBC).* Being the greatest data warehouse platform that your customers can’t write reports for isn’t going to be a great sell.
  • Ensure you are providing a good standard set of tools.* Query tools, design tools, data loading/integration tools etc.* If you are small getting any of the third party tool vendors to pay attention to you is going to be difficult.* Use compatible interfaces where you can to ease this but also make sure include your own support.
Strategies include the following.
#1 Be Bigger, Faster & Cheaper

At the top end of town, large data warehouses are getting larger.* Multi TB data warehouses are common PB & multi PB are at the leading edge.* But at the same time the response time requirements are getting smaller.



Horizontally partitioned, distributed, highly scalable database platforms are the only way to fulfill these requirements.* Doing this on traditional platforms (Oracle, SQL Server, Teradata, DB2) can be difficult and/or costly.* If you can make it simpler, while being scalable, faster & cheaper (cheaper licenses, less hardware, less difficult to deploy & manage) you’ll have a good story to tell.

Netezza, Greenplum, Vertica & Aster Data are examples in this group.
#2 Be Smaller, Faster & Cheaper

At the other end of the spectrum there are organizations that just want their report queries to run faster.* They may not want to build a multi PB data warehouse, they may just have a few hundred GB of data and want snappy, easier report style queries to run quickly.* Providing a simple, cheap database platform that is easy to implement and easy to migrate to means organizations can quickly start receiving bang for their buck.



Kickfire & Infobright are examples in this group.


#3 Be Specialized

Similar to what I spoke about in the Enterprise OLTP post, picking a specialization and focusing is always a good method for getting a foot inside the door (albeit in a limited initial capacity).* Focusing on a specialization and packaging up your database platform with re-built tools applicable for that specialization can be a great way to out maneuver the competitors.* Such examples of pre-packaged tools include reports, dashboards, alters and other analysis targeted towards that specialization.* This can further save your customers time and money from removing the need to build such capabilities be-spoke.

Tenbase & SenSage are examples in this group.











More...
Tony Bain is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Trends in Data Warehousing Peter O'Donnell Monash University Business Intelligence Blog 0 23rd June 2009 09:34 PM
SAP and Teradata deepen data warehousing ties admin SAP and Business Objects Forum 0 15th May 2009 03:06 PM
Data Warehousing Education Steve Bennett Data Warehousing 1 19th November 2008 04:14 PM
Data Mart V Data Warehousing - The geat Debate binboy Data Warehousing Tips and Techniques 1 16th July 2008 11:15 AM
MIP Need data warehousing consultants Steve Hitchman CORTEXers Wanted 0 7th April 2008 10:18 AM


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 04:02 AM.

© The Business Intelligence Group

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO