Go Back   CORTEX Forums > Vendors and Service Provders > Open Source Analytics > Open Source News and Opinion
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Should Microsoft be allowed to contribute to Joomla?

This is a discussion on Should Microsoft be allowed to contribute to Joomla? within the Open Source News and Opinion forums, part of the Open Source Analytics category; Microsoft has signed the Joomla Contribution Agreement: http://community.joomla.org/blogs/le...signs-jca.html Matthew Aslett at the 451 Group posted about it here – Tilting at Windows or (don’t be a Cnut) I agree with ...


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 6th May 2010, 11:19 AM   #1
News Bot
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 15,085
Latest News Headlines is on a distinguished road
Post Should Microsoft be allowed to contribute to Joomla?

Microsoft has signed the Joomla Contribution Agreement: http://community.joomla.org/blogs/le...signs-jca.html

Matthew Aslett at the 451 Group posted about it here – Tilting at Windows or (don’t be a Cnut)

I agree with him.

Reading the comments on the announcement is interesting. I see two kinds:
* Paranoid, irrational, subjective, and discriminatory ones objecting to Microsoft’s participation
* Well-balance, pragmatic, objective, and open ones cautiously welcoming the news

The basic issue is the same one as with the Oracle/MySQL situation, which I wrote about at the time: http://jamesdixon.wordpress.com/2009/05/14/open-source-fanatics-choose-wisely/

As with Oracle/MySQL there are calls to preemptively fork Joomla to prevent Microsoft participating. This is sad, self-limiting, counter-productive behavior. Worse it is directly counter to Joomla’s OSI license. To quote ‘The Free Software Definition”
“Free software” does not mean “noncommercial.” A free program must be available for commercial use, commercial development, and commercial distribution.

If you really advocate open source software, the positive participation of the large software companies is a good thing. Let them participate, and only criticize them when they do wrong. Preemptively forking projects to prevent them participating is counter to the OSI license and the philosophies of open source and free software. Using the banner of Free Software to incite exclusion discredits the movement.




More from James Dixon’s Blog ...
Latest News Headlines is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
No Dogs Allowed, but Sex Is Okay admin Prediction Markets News Feeds 0 30th April 2010 11:23 AM
Comment on 12+ Ways To Contribute To Open Source by Francesco Latest News Headlines Open Source News and Opinion 0 12th February 2010 08:35 AM
Mining the Cloud? Are You Allowed? admin Analytic News Feeds 0 22nd January 2010 05:37 PM
Mining the Cloud? Are You Allowed? Latest News Headlines Forrester 0 14th January 2010 06:03 AM
Low doc lending allowed by AOFM Latest News Headlines 2009 Q4 News Headlines 0 8th December 2009 07:23 AM


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 06:55 AM.

© The Business Intelligence Group

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO