Go Back   CORTEX Forums > Best Practices > Subject Matter Expertise > Analytics > Performance Management
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Have a go, it can bear fruit

This is a discussion on Have a go, it can bear fruit within the Performance Management forums, part of the Analytics category; Australian Financial Review TUE 05 JAN 2010, Page 46 By: Andrew Leigh The seeds of a quiet revolution in management are being sown on a fruit farm in Britain. While ...


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 5th January 2010, 04:07 PM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 45
Jo Vincent is on a distinguished road
Post Have a go, it can bear fruit

Australian Financial Review
TUE 05 JAN 2010, Page 46

By: Andrew Leigh

The seeds of a quiet revolution in management are being sown on a fruit farm in Britain. While neighbouring farms go about their business as usual, the owners of this establishment see each season as a chance to run experiments aimed at raising productivity and profits.

Halfway through the 2002 season, the pay scheme for all fruit pickers was suddenly switched from one that paid workers relative to their co-workers to a scheme that paid based on absolute performance. Midway through the 2004 season, a managerial bonus scheme was introduced, allowing the best managers to increase their earnings by about 25 per cent.
In 2005, fruit-picking teams found their performance charted at the end of each day. Later that season, the best teams began winning bonus payments.

In each case, the changes were engineered by a trio of young economists: Oriana Bandiera, Iwan Barankay and Imran Rasul. Tracking the changes, they found that rewarding workers for absolute performance raised productivity by a whopping 50 per cent, and that managerial bonus schemes boosted output by 21 per cent.

Yet when it comes to motivating teams, it turns out that charting performance is a bad idea (the underperformers become discouraged), while rewarding performance is effective (the best try even harder).

To see how radical this approach is, imagine how the typical firm would have approached the same problem. Step one: hire a team of well-dressed management consultants. Step two: pay six-figure bill. Step three: hold nose and implement recommendations.

Business experiments turn this logic on its head. Rather than paying for expert wisdom, the experimental approach says "try it and see".

Where the traditional literature is passionate and confident (with titles such as Straight from the Gut and Re-engineering the Corporation), the experimental approach is modest and open-minded (with titles such as Team Incentives: Evidence from a Field Experiment).

While the traditional approach listens to the consultant or the highest-paid person in the room, the experimental approach listens to the data.

Just as new drugs are evaluated using randomised trials, business experiments aim to bring both simplicity and scientific rigour to evaluating the impact of new strategies on the bottom line.

Perhaps the aspect of business that has made the best use of experiments is advertising. In formulating advertising campaigns, firms are increasingly recognising the limits to what can be learnt from experts and focus groups.

Rather than pick between two possible campaigns, the smarter approach may be to find test markets and try both.

This is most easily done in direct-mail or online campaigns, where it is possible to get customer-level variation (indeed, Google's AdWords software even allows small-time users to run such marketing experiments).

But by exploiting variation across chain stores, or in regional markets, firms have found ways to test other marketing strategies, too.

Business experiments have also helped quantify the value of a strong track record. In a series of experiments on eBay, Paul Resnick and his co-authors compare the prices of batches of vintage postcards sold by an established seller with a strong reputation versus a first-time seller. They find that first-time sellers receive prices that are 8 per cent lower, illustrating that reputation on eBay carries considerable financial value.

Experiments can even help firms decide how to set prices. Economist Steven Levitt gives the example of his work with a direct-marketing travel service, which experimented with randomly changing prices on its mailings. It found that demand barely fell when it raised prices. Not surprisingly, the company now charges considerably more than it did previously.

Randomisation "cuts through the complexity", Levitt argues.
"All you have to do is flip a coin and put people into treatment and control groups," he says. "In the end, you just have to be able to add it up and say, 'Am I selling more or am I making more profit in the group that got the treatment versus the group that got the control?' "

From fruit farms to travel agencies, experiments represent a powerful challenge to business as usual. Businesses are increasingly embracing the opportunity to get better feedback on everything from their human resources policies to their pricing strategies. Why settle for grizzled wisdom when you can try it and see?

- Andrew Leigh is an economist in the Research School of Economics at the Australian National University.
Jo Vincent is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +11. The time now is 02:52 PM.

© The Business Intelligence Group

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO